 |
|
Where did it begin, the public's fascination with the children of
celebrities? It seems to have had its genesis in 1953 with the birth of Lucille Ball's son. Ball became pregnant
while starring in her hit sitcom "I Love Lucy," and producers worked the
'spectin' into the storyline. Ball gave birth to a baby boy, Desi Arnaz Jr., on the same day that an
episode depicting the (fictional) birth of her (TV) baby aired. It was one
of the most-viewed television episodes of all time. Lady Lucy and baby
Desi made the premiere cover of TV Guide that same year.
More than fifty years after the viewing public was first entranced by
the child of a TV star, we're about to be treated to a new show on
A&E: "Sons of Hollywood," staring Randy Spelling, son of Aaron Spelling, and Sean Stewart, the
progeny of Rod Stewart, in what the network is billing
as a sort of real-life "Entourage." How Entourific for us all.
|
|
Celebutantes and
Celebrats
 |
If celebrities fascinate us (and they do) and babies are cute
(and lots of them are), it makes sense that the public would want to
see the babies of celebrities. Kind of. But how did we get from,
"Hey, there's Suri Cruise, an adorable, famous person's baby!" to
"Hey, there's the grown child of a famous person! Let's see if he
puts on his slouchy jeans one pants leg at a time!"? When did the
merging of fame-by-association and reality TV become not only
accepted, but expected? Was it Paris Hilton and her
"reality" show, "The Simple Life," which launched in
2003? Paris' fame-by-wealth status minted the term "celebutante." As
if that wasn't painful enough (and it really was), now cameras seem
compelled to also follow the famous-by-inheritance, which we are
sorely tempted to call "celebrats."
Masters Spelling and Stewart are just the latest in a long line
of nepotism television. Randy's sister, Tori Spelling, also a
child of the Big Cheese of Cheese TV, Aaron ("Gilligan's Island,"
"Beverly Hills 90210,") Spelling, got her start in her father's
projects. Love her or loathe her -- or both -- Ms. Spelling has
worked to make a name for herself in non reality-based faire,
including a number of clueless-girl-in-peril TV movies and the
decent 1997 indie film, "The House of Yes." And
yet, Ms. Spelling is not about to step down as the reigning Queen of
celebrats. She'll soon have a new reality show on the Oxygen network
based around her and her hubby's attempt at opening a bed and
breakfast, "Tori & Dean Inn Love."
Is it really the celebrats' fault that they think the public
wants to watch them while they binge at Quiznos, wait for phone
calls, groom their pets and generally act like regular folk (if
regular folk had a three-person camera crew following them around
while they spend or don't spend, or think about spending; or, are
instructed not to spend piles and piles of money)? A celebrat has
nothing of his or hers to offer. A celebrat, if not definitely
lacking in talent, is assuredly unable to turn in an Oscar-worthy
performance while ordering at the drive-thru Starbucks. Why do they
think we want to watch that? Where is the focus group that convinced
the network suits the public dearly wants to see people perform
menial tasks because they are related, sometimes tangentially, to
performers? | |
|
Celefellas and Celebrutes
 |
The airwaves have been littered lately with the daily goings-on
of the famous-by-DNAers. So varied are the reality TV'ed children of
the famous that we have to coin additional terminology for them in
order to understand the intricate hierarchy of their place in the
celebrity food chain. The daughter and three grandsons of
notorious Mafiosi "Teflon" John Gotti were depicted on "Growing Up Gotti." The Gotti boys,
infamous now for how much hair gel they needed during their three
seasons on A&E, were only on-screen for being the children of a
made man: aka the "celefellas" factor.
Wrestler Hulk Hogan's children
currently appear on VH1's "Hogan Knows Best."
According to Wikipedia, the show premiered in 2005 with a 1.9
Nielsen rating, the largest audience ever for a VH1 debut. Hogan's
children, Nick and Brooke, have yet to make their own names in
Tinseltown: Brooke is launching a singing career; Nick may be
joining the ranks of professional wresting. For now, though, the
only reason we know about them is that they are the children of a
well-known worldwide wrestler. In other words, celebrutes.
Meanwhile, Gene Simmons of the band
KISS has a reality show, too: "Gene Simmons: Family Jewels." And
because he's famous and they are his children, the viewing public
now knows about Nick and Sophie, two earnest, fresh-faced
KISSebrities. | |
|
Etc.
 |
Even those wannabes who aren't the children of stars can get
their own reality show -- as long as they're the brother or sister
of a star. This is what we call the celebra-sib factor. Ashlee Simpson had cameras trailing
her after big sis Jessica's "Newlyweds" did well on
MTV. "House of Carters" followed around teen
heartthrobs Nick and Aaron Carter as well as their not-famous
siblings. And in 2005, we were treated to "A Weekend With Jamie Lynn
Spears," because, well, she's Brit's little sister and that's
enough, isn't it?
It's more than enough. Nepotism TV. It's nothing new, but it's
never been this all-pervasive. E! ran two seasons of "The Gastineau
Girls" (who are known in nastier circles than mine as the
Gastinhos). The Girls (ex-wife and daughter of football player Mark
Gastineau) landed on E! due to nothing more than their celebling
factor.
"Sons of Hollywood" isn't even a new concept -- maybe that's
what's so galling. In the summer of 2005, FOX aired "The Princes of
Malibu," following brothers Brandon and Brody Jenner, sons of Bruce
Jenner, former Olympian and Wheaties cereal shill. The network aired
only two episodes before wisely pulling the show, though Brody has
reappeared on reality TV in this season's "The Hills" on MTV. And something about
the Jenner offspring must be utterly compelling: his stepdaughter,
Kourtney Kardashian, appeared on the E! network's reality series
"Filthy Rich: Cattle Drive." In fact, "Cattle Drive" may have broken
the record for the largest number of celebrats ever collected in a
single location. It included Robert Blake's son, Noah;
Pat Benatar's daughter, Haley; Anthony Quinn's son,
Alex; Lou Ferrigno's daughter,
Shanna; and, George Foreman III. Bet you can guess whose son he is.
But there have been a few children of celebrities with something
to offer in terms of actual talent. Look at Jamie Lee Curtis, Campbell Scott, Kate Hudson, Bryce Dallas Howard and
Sophia Coppola -- all
extremely talented. Let them audition for the stage, for a sitcom,
for that next blockbuster. Allow them to earn their way onto our
screens. Do we have to give them airtime on a Tuesday night so we
can watch them receive their personally-delivered Zone diet meals on
camera? If this trend continues, and it most likely will, we won't
have to wait much longer before we're treated to the day-to-day
escapades of Madonna's Lola and Rocco, and
Gwyneth's Apple and Moses. May we propose "The Celebrits"?
I wish nothing but the best of luck to the sons of Hollywood, to
the daughters and to the nieces, cousins and every other relative
out there. Family is great; I'm sure yours is terrific, and I find
mine, at times, highly entertaining. But that doesn't mean my
cousin's dog walker is getting his own opinion piece on
MSN. | |
|
Sound off: Comment on this story |
Also: Features archive
In
addition to her regular contributions for MSN TV, Barbara Card
Atkinson has written about television in some unusual places -- from
Universal Studios' Horroronline.com to Hooters Magazine. She has
published work in Salon, Nerve and The Christian Science Monitor, as
well as in numerous now-defunct multimedia Web sites. When she's not
writing, she's watching TV, or wasting her time (and yours) at
www.BarbaraCardAtkinson.blogspot.com.
Page 1 of 1 |
 |
|
|
| |
|