By Sean Axmaker
Special to MSN Movies

See also: Was 'Ratatouille' Robbed of a Best Picture nod?
See also: Full list of Oscar nominees

It's an open question whether the red carpet, the stargazing, the invariably overlong ceremony with its record of misjudged entertainment set pieces, and the obligatory afterparties will be present, but to paraphrase one of this year's big nominees: There will be Oscars.

If there is a consensus among critics this year, it's that it was a good year for American cinema. Some might say it was a great year for American movies. There was certainly no lack of ambition in nomination leaders "There Will Be Blood" and "No Country for Old Men," not to mention films such as "Into the Wild," "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" and "I'm Not There." Academy voters actually snubbed splashy hits such as "Hairspray," traditional Oscar bait such as "American Gangster" and bubbly star-studded pictures such as "Charlie Wilson's War" for a selection of darker and more ambitious dramas. Well, as long as they are not about Iraq ...

These studio-funded films fall somewhere between the kind of adult pictures studios used to favor and the indie projects that took over from the studios when they put their attention into youth-oriented spectacles, action films and sequels ... which means there's not a popular hit in the bunch. So far, the teen pregnancy comedy "Juno" is the biggest hit in the Best Picture category this year.

For the most part, it's a classy bunch, but there's always room for complaining. There is no shortage of deserving artists who didn't make Oscar's cut and we're not shy about sharing our opinions on where the academy went wrong. So here is our report card on Oscar's slights and oversights. Call it: They shoulda been a contender.

Best Picture

The five Best Picture nominees are a worthy -- if fairly dark -- class this year, lightened only by the inclusion of the indie-ish comedy "Juno." I adore the film, I confess, and find it far more interesting and alive than last year's token quasi-indie "Little Miss Sunshine." But I'd prefer to see Sean Penn's "Into the Wild" -- the glaring omission of the category -- in its place. This sprawling, ragged human epic throws the audience headlong into the romance of an odyssey across America, living in the moment and in the buzzing thrill of the quest for something that may not exist. Carved out of primal imagery, raw emotion and pure passion, Penn's ambition may exceed his grasp but only by degrees.

The academy has traditionally been resistant to genre films, which is the only reason I can fathom for the snubbing of "Zodiac" in every category. David Fincher's mesmerizing drama about the obsessive search for the true-life serial killer who terrorized San Francisco in the late '60s and early '70s made many a critic's top 10 list but didn't receive one nomination. Talk about a killer! Also, when it comes to ambition, it's hard to beat "I'm Not There," surely the most eccentric and creative biographical drama ever made.

(Story Continues On Next Page...)

Page 1 of 2 
NextNext
E-mail
Digg
Facebook
Blog it
Photo Highlights
Oscar Winners
Day-Lewis, Bardem, others with their statuettes
Red-Carpet Gallery
The stars shine outside Kodak Theatre
Video Highlights
Best Picture Montage
Take a look at the nominees for the top Oscar nod
Best Actor Montage
Watch video of nominated actors
Who do you think is the hottest twosome?
Background image: ©Michael Banks/Getty Images
CLICK TO ADD TO CALENDAR      CLOSE

add to MSN CALENDAR >
add to MICROSOFT OUTLOOK >
add to APPLE iCal >
add to GOOGLE CALENDAR >
add to YAHOO CALENDAR >
  1. How would you grade this year's Oscars?

Skip to results

  1. How would you grade this year's Oscars?
    1. A: It's about time the Coens got their due
      17%
    2. B: Stewart was funny, short speeches. Fun time
      23%
    3. C: Same old Oscars, just a different year
      20%
    4. F: Was it even on?
      40%
248615 responses, not scientifically valid, results updated every minute.