By Jake Coyle
The Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) -- Among the tales of depravity and violence that dominate this year's Academy Awards race sits the bright and shining "Ratatouille." A rat never seemed so sanitized.

The Pixar film landed five Oscar nominations and was ranked by many critics as one of the year's best, yet was never a serious contender for best picture. Instead, it was relegated to the relatively new category of best animated feature, which the academy began dolling out in 2002.

Directed by Brad Bird, "Ratatouille" has garnered an aggregate score of 96 on Metacritic.com, ranking it above "Pulp Fiction," let alone this year's best picture candidates: "No Country for Old Men," "There Will Be Blood," "Juno," "Atonement" and "Michael Clayton."

And its other nominations across three different disciplines — best original screenplay, best score, best sound mixing and best sound editing — suggest the kind of broad consensus that often results in bigger awards like best director or best picture.

Its five nominations rank as the most ever for a computer animated film, and rate second among all animated films, only surpassed by the six received by Disney's "Beauty and the Beast." That picture, done in the traditional Disney style in 1991, stands as the only animated film to ever be nominated for best picture.

If not for the best animated feature category, it's safe to say "Ratatouille" would have been strongly considered for best picture. Brad Lewis, the film's producer, is quick to point out that he has no sour grapes with the academy — and that he's ecstatic about the five widespread nominations.

Still, he has to wonder.

"Ultimately, it makes it perhaps too convenient for people to look at an animated film from an isolated perspective," said "Ratatouille" Lewis. "Somebody can say, `You know what? We have a place for that, so we don't necessarily have to give it broader consideration.'"

Tom O'Neil, a columnist specializing in awards coverage for the Los Angeles Times' "The Envelope" Web site, has pondered whether "Ratatouille" — which he calls the best reviewed movie of the year — is the equivalent of "Beauty and the Beast," only it had to deal with the specialized category.

"Is this a case where it's penalized and ghettoized because there's a separate category for animated fare?" O'Neill said. "It seems to have the same respect in the industry and among film critics as `Beauty and the Best.'"

"Ratatouille," made by Walt Disney Company and its Pixar Animations Studios, is also not a conventional animated movie. Its framing is largely based on the techniques of classic filmmaking, and the story of a rat who dreams to be a chef has been called a Joycean "Portrait of the Artist as a Young Rat."

"I don't think people when they walk out of `Ratatouille' the first thing that they're thinking about is `I went and saw an animated film today,'" said Lewis. "It's partly because we're telling more sophisticated stories and I think it's because we have a more sophisticated filmmaking tool."

"Ratatouille" also has the support of that great international critical body: the French.

(Story Continues On Next Page...)

Page 1 of 2 
NextNext
E-mail
Digg
Facebook
Blog it
Photo Highlights
Oscar Winners
Day-Lewis, Bardem, others with their statuettes
Red-Carpet Gallery
The stars shine outside Kodak Theatre
Video Highlights
Best Picture Montage
Take a look at the nominees for the top Oscar nod
Best Actor Montage
Watch video of nominated actors
Who do you think is the hottest twosome?
Background image: ©Michael Banks/Getty Images
CLICK TO ADD TO CALENDAR      CLOSE

add to MSN CALENDAR >
add to MICROSOFT OUTLOOK >
add to APPLE iCal >
add to GOOGLE CALENDAR >
add to YAHOO CALENDAR >
  1. How would you grade this year's Oscars?

Skip to results

  1. How would you grade this year's Oscars?
    1. A: It's about time the Coens got their due
      17%
    2. B: Stewart was funny, short speeches. Fun time
      23%
    3. C: Same old Oscars, just a different year
      20%
    4. F: Was it even on?
      40%
248615 responses, not scientifically valid, results updated every minute.