Franchise Resurrection
Which movie series are worth revisiting ... and which
should remain in the can?
By Don
Kaye
Special to MSN
Movies
It sounds like a line from a horror movie ad: Nothing
stays dead forever. But in the movie business , that's literally true. There has
rarely been a good idea in Hollywood that has not been unearthed, revisited,
resurrected, reimagined or rebooted, either as a continuing series of films or,
particularly in recent times, as a remake -- as long as it makes money, of
course. Since the turn of the 21st century alone we've had three "Spider-Man"
flicks, a "Pirates of the Caribbean" trilogy, a horde of "X-Men" and a trio of
"Ocean's," and, recently, Indiana Jones' return (with mixed results) -- and
that's just scratching the surface.
But we're here to talk about those franchises that have been quiet for a
while, or at least have seemed to be in their last throes. With a few
exceptions, each of the following film series has been inactive for at least
five years -- and in many cases even longer. Yet a number of properties going
back 20 years or more have all been mooted for revival in recent times -- as
clear an indication as any that today's studio execs are either pining for their
childhood favorites or are simply out of original ideas.
We happen to think that some of these concepts could benefit from a new
approach or an updated story line, and we'd love to see a few of these
characters (RoboCop, for instance) back on the big screen. But not every iconic
film series can simply succeed with a fresh coat of paint or a hefty dose of CG.
The "Die Hard" and "Alien" product lines are just two glaring examples --
although we admit we wouldn't mind ditching the woeful "Alien vs. Predator"
installments in favor of a rematch with Sigourney Weaver's Ripley.
So here is a list of some film franchises we think could work again, and a
few we'd like to see stay dead. For those we approve of, we've included our
own humble proposals for a plot. No need to thank us -- just get the movie
right.
The Terminator
Last
film: "Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines" (2003)
Status: "The Terminator" was one of the great geek movies
of the '80s, a low-budget sci-fi flick that delivered action, suspense,
violence, a great story and Arnold Schwarzenegger in his defining role. "Terminator 2: Judgment Day" (1991) expanded the tale into an
epic, with groundbreaking visuals and an elegant completion of the time-travel
saga. They should have left it there -- "Terminator 3" was far from the disaster
that many feared, but it made nonsense out of the first two entries' logic.
Based on early script reports, next year's "Terminator Salvation" stretches the story well past its
breaking point, changing the timeline entirely. And Arnold isn't even in it!
This franchise has said "I'll be back" at least once too often.
Mad Max
Last film: "Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome" (1985)
Status: "Thunderdome," the third entry in the series about
a rogue cop wandering a postapocalyptic wilderness, was initially perceived as a
disappointment after the brilliance of the second film, "The Road Warrior."
Nevertheless, a new movie, "Mad Max IV: Fury Road," has been in "pre-production"
since late 2007, with creator/director George Miller once again slated to get
behind the camera. But with Miller planning to film in Africa, concerns about
security have slowed the start of production. There's also the little matter of
finding a new Max -- Mel Gibson says he's too old for the part now.
Plot: We like the idea of resurrecting Max with a big
budget and a fresh approach, so why not have Gibson cameo as an aged Max, on his
deathbed, dispensing wisdom and passing the torch to one of the now-grown tribal
children from "Thunderdome"? The fledgling society set up by the children in the
ruins of Sydney could be endangered by a new threat, and it's up to the youthful
leader to "become" the legendary Max and save his new civilization.
Dirty Harry
Last
film: "The Dead Pool" (1988)
Status: Although
Clint Eastwood said not long ago that he wasn't interested
in returning to one of his signature characters, vigilante-like San Francisco
cop "Dirty" Harry Callahan, his denial alone seemed to spark interest in
reviving the franchise. Rumors abound that a newly announced Eastwood picture,
"Gran Torino," is the next Dirty Harry picture, although that
speculation seems to be have been dismissed by Eastwood himself. The actor has
stated that he's too old to play the role again, but we think that could work in
his favor.
Plot: Eastwood's own films in the past 20 years
or so have portrayed the all-too-grim results of violence, and, in the case of
his masterful "Unforgiven," what happens when people take the law into
their own hands. A new "Dirty Harry" film, showing an aged Callahan grappling
with these issues, could fit nicely into that narrative. Pit Harry against, say,
an urban terrorist, set him at odds with a corrupt government agency and younger
cops within his own force who see him as a role model, and you've got the
makings of a compelling and timely thriller.
RoboCop
Last film: "RoboCop 3" (1993)
Status: Like so many
third films in a series, "RoboCop 3" was a pale imitation of its predecessors,
severely hampered by a PG-13 rating that took the teeth right out of the
franchise. But the idea of continuing the saga of the cyborg law enforcer has
never quite gone out of style. It was recently announced that director Darren Aronofsky ("Requiem for a Dream" and "The Fountain") will helm a reboot of the character.
Aronofsky -- whose radical take on Batman a few years ago was reportedly even
darker than the one eventually filmed by Christopher Nolan -- could be the perfect choice
to switch RoboCop back on.
Plot: The original "RoboCop"
themes of corporate control of society, media manipulation, and rogue law
enforcement are even more topical now than they were 20 years ago. Since today's
society has quickly caught up with the original film's dystopian future, we
propose something radical ourselves: Have RoboCop sent back in time to the
present, and watch what happens as various factions try to gain control of this
particular weapon of mass destruction. Perhaps he'll even meet his parents or
himself as a young child, reactivating his humanity. I'd buy that for a dollar.
Austin Powers
Last
film: "Austin Powers: Goldmember" (2002)
Status: You know Mike Myers is looking at the box office returns of the
dismal "Love Guru" and thinking, "Hmm ... time to get my hugely
successful retro spy spoof on again." In fact, an "Austin Powers 4" has been
reported as going into production in 2009, with Myers stating in several
interviews that the film would focus more on Dr. Evil than Austin. There's only
one catch: "Goldmember" was just not that funny. In fact, neither was "Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery." Only "The Spy Who Shagged Me" really worked. Based on all that,
and the turn Myers' ideas have taken recently, the idea of a fourth "Austin"
film just doesn't make us horny, baby.
Next: More film franchises we'd revive ... and some we'd
leave dead