World Trade Center

:

Critics' Reviews

advertisement
Metascore
®
66
Generally favorable reviews
out of 100
'World Trade Center' a Waiting Game
By John Hartl, Film critic, MSNBC

Not all Sept. 11 stories are created equal. There is, for example, something inherently dramatic about the doomed flight of United 93 — which became the basis of a powerful movie of that name just a few months ago.

But the predicament of two Port Authority policeman trapped in the rubble left by the twin towers is not as easy to dramatize. Oliver Stone's "World Trade Center," written by first-time screenwriter Andrea Berloff, takes 129 minutes to tell their story, which is essentially about waiting.

The policemen, John McLoughlin (Nicolas Cage) and Will Jimeno (Michael Pena), spend most of the movie waiting to be rescued while their hopes dim. McLoughlin's anxious wife Donna (Maria Bello) and Jimeno's very pregnant wife Allison (Maggie Gyllenhaal) wait to hear if their husbands have survived the disaster.

Unable to move and fearing the worst, the men stay awake by trading banalities and remembering their rather generic families. Jimeno claims to have been visited by Jesus — unfortunately illustrated as an ambiguous blob of light — while McLoughlin indulges in a hopeful bit of marriage counseling. Cage and Pena work hard at sustaining these scenes, but they're hamstrung by the physical limitations of their characters.

The women are more interesting, partly because they get to interact with friends, kids, neighbors and well-wishers. Bello emphasizes Donna's impatience as well as her grace under pressure. Gyllenhaal, who delivers the most arresting performance, makes the most of an episode in which the restless, emotionally suffocated Allison can no longer stay in her car to wait for a red light.

Also playing the waiting game are several policemen and an ex-Marine who risk their lives to determine if anyone is left alive in the rubble. The actors in these roles are often minor celebrities (Stephen Dorff, Frank Whaley) whose familiar, grit-covered faces distract rather than add to any sense of authenticity. ("United 93," cast with unknowns, did not make this mistake.)

Claustrophobia dominates the final three-quarters of the movie, which often suggests a mining-disaster drama rather than a Sept. 11 chronicle. The first half-hour is filled with infinitely more dramatic sounds and images: the surreal shadow of a plane headed for its target, a sudden thud that announces the arrival of the hijackers, the chaos and carnage inside the falling towers.

Stone is at his best with these scenes, which demonstrate the helplessness of the people crushed in the towers, who literally did not know what hit them. Rumors circulate, of a plane hitting the second tower, or a missile attacking the Pentagon, but communication is consistently presented as haphazard and difficult to act upon.

As the Sept. 11 anniversary approaches, and a famously perverse columnist dares to trash the Sept. 11 widows ("I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much"), it's good to be reminded of what exactly happened on that day. The movie's strongest emotion is nostalgia for a time of national unity, when such callous statements would be rejected automatically.

But "World Trade Center," once it moves past the shocking events of Sept. 11, lacks narrative momentum. The inexperience of its screenwriter shows in the domestic scenes, which Stone directs in such a timid fashion that the picture threatens to turn into soap opera. Utterly missing is a motive, which "United 93" clearly and concisely established as Islamic fanaticism.

More movies on MSNBC 

Not all Sept. 11 stories are created equal. There is, for example, something inherently dramatic about the doomed flight of United 93 — which became the basis of a powerful movie of that name just a few months ago.

But the predicament of two Port Authority policeman trapped in the rubble left by the twin towers is not as easy to dramatize. Oliver Stone's "World Trade Center," written by first-time screenwriter Andrea Berloff, takes 129 minutes to tell their story, which is essentially about waiting.

The policemen, John McLoughlin (Nicolas Cage) and Will Jimeno (Michael Pena), spend most of the movie waiting to be rescued while their hopes dim. McLoughlin's anxious wife Donna (Maria Bello) and Jimeno's very pregnant wife Allison (Maggie Gyllenhaal) wait to hear if their husbands have survived the disaster.

Unable to move and fearing the worst, the men stay awake by trading banalities and remembering their rather generic families. Jimeno claims to have been visited by Jesus — unfortunately illustrated as an ambiguous blob of light — while McLoughlin indulges in a hopeful bit of marriage counseling. Cage and Pena work hard at sustaining these scenes, but they're hamstrung by the physical limitations of their characters.

The women are more interesting, partly because they get to interact with friends, kids, neighbors and well-wishers. Bello emphasizes Donna's impatience as well as her grace under pressure. Gyllenhaal, who delivers the most arresting performance, makes the most of an episode in which the restless, emotionally suffocated Allison can no longer stay in her car to wait for a red light.

Also playing the waiting game are several policemen and an ex-Marine who risk their lives to determine if anyone is left alive in the rubble. The actors in these roles are often minor celebrities (Stephen Dorff, Frank Whaley) whose familiar, grit-covered faces distract rather than add to any sense of authenticity. ("United 93," cast with unknowns, did not make this mistake.)

Claustrophobia dominates the final three-quarters of the movie, which often suggests a mining-disaster drama rather than a Sept. 11 chronicle. The first half-hour is filled with infinitely more dramatic sounds and images: the surreal shadow of a plane headed for its target, a sudden thud that announces the arrival of the hijackers, the chaos and carnage inside the falling towers.

Stone is at his best with these scenes, which demonstrate the helplessness of the people crushed in the towers, who literally did not know what hit them. Rumors circulate, of a plane hitting the second tower, or a missile attacking the Pentagon, but communication is consistently presented as haphazard and difficult to act upon.

As the Sept. 11 anniversary approaches, and a famously perverse columnist dares to trash the Sept. 11 widows ("I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much"), it's good to be reminded of what exactly happened on that day. The movie's strongest emotion is nostalgia for a time of national unity, when such callous statements would be rejected automatically.

But "World Trade Center," once it moves past the shocking events of Sept. 11, lacks narrative momentum. The inexperience of its screenwriter shows in the domestic scenes, which Stone directs in such a timid fashion that the picture threatens to turn into soap opera. Utterly missing is a motive, which "United 93" clearly and concisely established as Islamic fanaticism.

More movies on MSNBC 

90
NewsWeek: David Ansen
World Trade Center celebrates the ties that bind us, the bonds that keep us going, the goodness that stands as a rebuke to the horror of that day. Perhaps, in the future, the times will call for more challenging, or polemical, or subversive visions. Right now, it feels like the 9/11 movie we need.Read Full Review »
90
The New York Times: Dana Stevens
Mr. Stone has taken a public tragedy and turned it into something at once genuinely stirring and terribly sad. His film offers both a harrowing return to a singular, disastrous episode in the recent past and a refuge from the ugly, depressing realities of its aftermath.Read Full Review »
90
Time: Richard Schickel
Very simply, World Trade Center is a powerful movie experience, a hymn in plainsong that glorifies that which is best in the American spirit.Read Full Review »
88
Philadelphia Inquirer: Carrie Rickey
The script by Andrea Berloff is stunning in its simplicity and aching details.Read Full Review »
88
ReelViews: James Berardinelli
World Trade Center is Stone's most potent motion picture since "Platoon," and may be the most accessible across-the-board since "Wall Street."Read Full Review »
75
USA Today: Claudia Puig
Where "United 93" was a superb example of masterful storytelling, World Trade Center is a more conventional rendering.Read Full Review »
75
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Owen Gleiberman
A scrupulous and honorable film. Yet it never comes close to being a revelatory one; it sentimentalizes more than it haunts.Read Full Review »
75
ROLLING STONE: Peter Travers
Undeniably affecting, but you leave it wanting more.Read Full Review »
75
Boston Globe: Ty Burr
One reason World Trade Center is such a good, healing cry is that it absolves us of the discomfort of thinking about everything that has happened since.Read Full Review »
70
Village Voice: J. Hoberman
World Trade Center is Stone's rehabilitation. It's not just courage that's honored, it's God's Will. It isn't only men who are saved, it's their families -- and their family values.Read Full Review »
See all World Trade Center reviews at metacritic.com »