The movie's story actually does work as a story and not simply as a wheezy Hollywood formula. Sometimes you walk into a movie with quiet dread and walk out with quiet delight.Read Full Review »
60
The New York Times: Dana Stevens
Superfluous though it may be, The Honeymooners is not so bad.Read Full Review »
42
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Scott Brown
Epps has a nicely beaten charm to him -- among the leads, he alone looks like he knows what a trip to the moon costs.Read Full Review »
40
LOS ANGELES TIMES: Carina Chocano
John Leguizamo steals the show as its sleazy trainer -- not that there's much to steal from John Schultz's joylessly schematic paycheck.Read Full Review »
30
Village Voice: Mark Holcomb
John Schultz's wan, unfunny The Honeymooners is unlikely to tickle devotees of Jackie Gleason's archetypal yuk-fest.Read Full Review »
30
Washington Post: Teresa Wiltz
Though Cedric, for all his nimble portliness, is no Gleason, there's plenty of talent to be found here. Too bad it's left to fend for itself against a raging mechanical bull of a script.Read Full Review »
25
Philadelphia Inquirer: David Hiltbrand
This one is so bad that even Ed Norton couldn't get this mess to move through the sewer.Read Full Review »
25
USA Today: Mike Clark
A pitiful update that saddles poor Cedric the Entertainer with the unenviable task of taking over Jackie Gleason's premier creation, Ralph Kramden.Read Full Review »
12
Boston Globe: Wesley Morris
It's not as bad as the average Hollywood movie, it's stupendously worse.Read Full Review »
0
Washington Post: Desson Thomson
Suffice it to say, there is no comedy, no chemistry, no nothing in this movie.Read Full Review »
Hotmail
