Infamous

:

Critics' Reviews

Metascore
®
68
Generally favorable reviews
out of 100
'Infamous' Not Just Déjà Vu
By John Hartl, Film critic, MSNBC

The near-simultaneous release of two movies on the same subject usually spells disaster for one of them.

Perhaps most famously, "Valmont" never recovered from being released shortly after "Dangerous Liaisons," which told exactly the same story. It didn't matter that Annette Bening and Colin Firth were just as good as Glenn Close and John Malkovich (and arguably more appropriately cast), or that "Valmont" had a more youthful, less calculated quality. What mattered was that this "instant remake" came too soon.

The same fate may befall writer-director Doug McGrath's "Infamous," which tells essentially the same story as Bennett Miller's instant classic, "Capote." Yet while there's no question that Miller's version is the stronger, more cinematic achievement, there's much to enjoy in McGrath's account of how Truman Capote came to write "In Cold Blood."

British actor Toby Jones (Smee in "Finding Neverland") may never replace Philip Seymour Hoffman's Oscar-winning performance in Miller's film, but he looks and sounds more like the real Capote. Physically he's just a better match, and his acting cannot be faulted. He inhabits the role without straining.

The same could be said of Sandra Bullock, who helps to make Harper Lee a less passive character than she was in "Capote." By emphasizing her gregarious nature and pragmatic qualities, she and McGrath demonstrate just how crucial Lee's role was in the creation of "In Cold Blood." At the same time, by emphasizing her disagreements with Capote over the conception of this "non-fiction novel," the movie underlines her independence.

At times, the movies flatly contradict each other. In "Infamous," Bennett Cerf (played by Peter Bogdanovich) replaces William Shawn (Bob Balaban) as the confidante who guides Capote through his most hellish moments. The homoerotic relationship between Capote and the murderous Perry Smith (Daniel Craig) is much more explicit, while the relationship between Capote and his longtime lover is downplayed.

"Infamous" often spells out what "Capote" merely suggested. Sometimes that doesn't work — there's an unnecessary sense of artifice in the early scenes — and sometimes it does. Craig's Perry is both scarier and more vulnerable than Clifton Collins Jr.'s Perry in "Capote." They're both valid approaches to the part, but Craig (the new James Bond) can't help being more magnetic.

As co-producer Christine Vachon reveals in her new book, "A Killer Life," Julia Roberts nearly landed the Harper Lee role. That would probably have been disastrous, partly because Lee's part would have been beefed up to take advantage of Roberts' marquee value, yet there's a trace of that emphasis in "Infamous."

At film's end, McGrath suggests that "In Cold Blood" not only ruined Capote's career; it might have taken down Lee as well. She talks about writing a follow-up to "To Kill a Mockingbird," yet, like Capote, she essentially ended her career with her most famous book. "Infamous" is often funnier and livelier than "Capote," especially when it's expanding on the New York literary circle that nurtured Capote (Sigourney Weaver, Hope Davis and Juliet Stevenson are especially droll). But, ultimately, it's just as sad.

More movies on MSNBC 

The near-simultaneous release of two movies on the same subject usually spells disaster for one of them.

Perhaps most famously, "Valmont" never recovered from being released shortly after "Dangerous Liaisons," which told exactly the same story. It didn't matter that Annette Bening and Colin Firth were just as good as Glenn Close and John Malkovich (and arguably more appropriately cast), or that "Valmont" had a more youthful, less calculated quality. What mattered was that this "instant remake" came too soon.

The same fate may befall writer-director Doug McGrath's "Infamous," which tells essentially the same story as Bennett Miller's instant classic, "Capote." Yet while there's no question that Miller's version is the stronger, more cinematic achievement, there's much to enjoy in McGrath's account of how Truman Capote came to write "In Cold Blood."

British actor Toby Jones (Smee in "Finding Neverland") may never replace Philip Seymour Hoffman's Oscar-winning performance in Miller's film, but he looks and sounds more like the real Capote. Physically he's just a better match, and his acting cannot be faulted. He inhabits the role without straining.

The same could be said of Sandra Bullock, who helps to make Harper Lee a less passive character than she was in "Capote." By emphasizing her gregarious nature and pragmatic qualities, she and McGrath demonstrate just how crucial Lee's role was in the creation of "In Cold Blood." At the same time, by emphasizing her disagreements with Capote over the conception of this "non-fiction novel," the movie underlines her independence.

At times, the movies flatly contradict each other. In "Infamous," Bennett Cerf (played by Peter Bogdanovich) replaces William Shawn (Bob Balaban) as the confidante who guides Capote through his most hellish moments. The homoerotic relationship between Capote and the murderous Perry Smith (Daniel Craig) is much more explicit, while the relationship between Capote and his longtime lover is downplayed.

"Infamous" often spells out what "Capote" merely suggested. Sometimes that doesn't work — there's an unnecessary sense of artifice in the early scenes — and sometimes it does. Craig's Perry is both scarier and more vulnerable than Clifton Collins Jr.'s Perry in "Capote." They're both valid approaches to the part, but Craig (the new James Bond) can't help being more magnetic.

As co-producer Christine Vachon reveals in her new book, "A Killer Life," Julia Roberts nearly landed the Harper Lee role. That would probably have been disastrous, partly because Lee's part would have been beefed up to take advantage of Roberts' marquee value, yet there's a trace of that emphasis in "Infamous."

At film's end, McGrath suggests that "In Cold Blood" not only ruined Capote's career; it might have taken down Lee as well. She talks about writing a follow-up to "To Kill a Mockingbird," yet, like Capote, she essentially ended her career with her most famous book. "Infamous" is often funnier and livelier than "Capote," especially when it's expanding on the New York literary circle that nurtured Capote (Sigourney Weaver, Hope Davis and Juliet Stevenson are especially droll). But, ultimately, it's just as sad.

More movies on MSNBC 

90
The New York Times: A.O. Scott
Less a parable of literary ethics than a showcase of literary personality, and it is in the end more touching than troubling.Read Full Review »
80
Washington Post: Stephen Hunter
Though it's not as good as the brilliant "Capote," it's nevertheless a riveting, well-made picture.Read Full Review »
75
Philadelphia Inquirer: Carrie Rickey
"Capote" is serious, deep and unadorned in the manner of the 1967 movie adaptation of the writer's true-crime novel "In Cold Blood." And Infamous boasts the high-gloss frivolity of the 1961 film version of Capote's "Breakfast at Tiffany's."Read Full Review »
75
ReelViews: James Berardinelli
"Capote" is the more intellectual of the two films; Infamous is the more emotional. They exist to complement, not eclipse, one another.Read Full Review »
75
USA Today: Claudia Puig
It's a stellar cast, but you can't help but lament the bad timing.Read Full Review »
75
Boston Globe: Ty Burr
The pleasure of Infamous is in its gallery of larger-than-life portrayals.Read Full Review »
70
Village Voice: Robert Wilonsky
It's just a lesser version, light in weight and absent the ache that permeated the movie for which Philip Seymour Hoffman won an Academy Award. It can't withstand the comparisons. It's good, especially during its first half, just not good enough.Read Full Review »
67
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Lisa Schwarzbaum
The added value that writer-director Douglas McGrath has in mind is gossip -- and a goggly interest in gossip becomes the glittering gimmick of Infamous.Read Full Review »
63
ROLLING STONE: Peter Travers
The film's most pleasing surprise is the beautifully nuanced portrait of Capote's confidante, "To Kill a Mockingbird" author Harper Lee, by Sandra Bullock. You heard me. Bullock gives the film what it otherwise lacks: the ring of truth.Read Full Review »
50
LOS ANGELES TIMES: Kenneth Turan
The problem is that the first half of Infamous is nowhere near as comic as McGrath intends. Instead the picture gives off a tone of arch stylization that plays as artificial, overwrought and off-putting.Read Full Review »
See all Infamous reviews at metacritic.com »