|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| The movie is not showing in your specified area; please change to a different location or a different movie | |
| | |
'Couples Retreat': Trouble in Paradise James Rocchi, Special to MSN Movies
Relationships are tricky. Relationship comedies are even more so. Go too
light on the real, raw, messy business of living and loving with someone, and
you've got a glib, glossy lie. Go too heavy on it, and you're a few barked angry
words (or longer, scarier silences) away from "Scenes From a Marriage." "Couples Retreat," the new
trouble-in-paradise comedy directed by Peter Billingsley in his feature-film debut, actually
doesn't go too easy on the real relationship stuff. Like Vince Vaughn's similar "The Break-Up," it has an eye, and ear, for the way
relationships fall apart terribly slowly and then all at once. What it lacks is
a truly concentrated comedy punch, preferring instead to land a series of
scattered jabs from the 16 arms of its eight leads.
Jason Bateman and Kristen Bell are a preppy, perfect power couple,
except they can't conceive. Malin Akerman and Vaughn are dealing
with their two new kids and barely have the time for anything else. Faizon Love, recently divorced, is kidding himself by dating
Kali Hawk, who's pretty much just a kid. And Jon Favreau and Kristin Davis got married early when they faced
the prospect of their daughter and are now counting out the clock until she
splits off to college and they can split for good.
And so in the script (credited to Vaughn, Favreau and Dana Fox) we have a
pretty deft portrait of four different marriages: the new parents, the
can't-be-parents, the recent parents and the recently divorced. Bell and
Bateman, desperate to work things out, want to go to a tropical resort's couples
counseling event, said to work wonders, but can only afford it if they get the
group rate. Figuring they'll play while their friends work, the other three
couples sign up, but are informed by the island's couples guru Jean Reno and his majordomo Peter Serafinowicz (doing an early-Walken weirdness thing, and quite well) that, to get the
group rate, they all have to do the couples workshop.
And while the three supposedly-fine couples demur, they, it turns out, could
use a little fine-tuning. And this may be the best thing about "Couples
Retreat": It has comedy around the marriages (and relationships) but it never
treats the marriages and relationships as jokes. So while, yes, Reno explains
how his teachings are based on a mix of "yoga, tai chi and 'The Art of War,'" we
also get to see these characters as something close to real people in something
close to crisis. (Bateman and Bell are the clear acting winners in this regard,
delivering scenes of real affection and real sadness, with Vaughn and Akerman a
close second; Love and Hawk's problems get solved a bit too tidily, and Favreau
and Davis' a bit too broadly for any real acting to be required.)
But while the relationship material in "Couples Retreat" is handled with the
same hard-nosed, open-eyed honesty as "The Break-Up," a lot of the supposedly
funny bits in "Couples Retreat" aren't. A bit with a hard-bodied yoga instructor
with very little modesty and no sense of personal space (Carlos Ponce, in what
would have been a Hank Azaria role five or 10 years ago) isn't especially
amusing. Favreau's motor-mouthed horndog ways also have a limited shelf life.
And while having four couples in the mix means that "Couples Retreat" can
explore many different kinds of trouble, it also means that the laughs get a
little diluted by a slightly too-large scope and a slightly too-long running
time.
But there are laughs in "Couples Retreat," like Vaughn being confounded by
Akerman asking him to choose a finish for their kitchen cupboard handles, with
options of "nickel, brushed nickel, chrome, or brushed chrome." Or how Love,
told he has to do couples counseling, lapses into "Enter the Dragon" references: "And now we're on Han's
island." But the final-act conclusions come a bit too easily, and a bit too
swiftly, and the film has a completely mischosen final scene that, while it may
hearken back to an earlier joke, abandons the eight central characters and
leaves you feeling sour and unsatisfied, asking a rhetorical question of
everyone involved: "Really, this is the best final scene you could think of?
Really?"
"Couples Retreat" looks gorgeous, and has a bunch of fun people in it. But,
as Steven Soderbergh noted when making "Ocean's Eleven," if there were a correlation between how
much fun a movie is to make and how good it actually is, "Cannonball Run" would beat out "Citizen Kane" for the honor of greatest film ever. "Couples
Retreat" has a great cast, a gorgeous setting and a well-balanced tone about the
reality of relationships; it's when you watch the script unfold that you can see
where this "Retreat" could have used a better plan of attack.
Also:
Gallery: Unhappily Ever After
Critic in Paradise
James Rocchi's writings on film have appeared at Cinematical.com,
Netflix.com, SFGate.com and in Mother Jones magazine. He lives in Los Angeles,
where every ending is a twist ending.
Relationships are tricky. Relationship comedies are even more so. Go too
light on the real, raw, messy business of living and loving with someone, and
you've got a glib, glossy lie. Go too heavy on it, and you're a few barked angry
words (or longer, scarier silences) away from "Scenes From a Marriage." "Couples Retreat," the new
trouble-in-paradise comedy directed by Peter Billingsley in his feature-film debut, actually
doesn't go too easy on the real relationship stuff. Like Vince Vaughn's similar "The Break-Up," it has an eye, and ear, for the way
relationships fall apart terribly slowly and then all at once. What it lacks is
a truly concentrated comedy punch, preferring instead to land a series of
scattered jabs from the 16 arms of its eight leads.
Jason Bateman and Kristen Bell are a preppy, perfect power couple,
except they can't conceive. Malin Akerman and Vaughn are dealing
with their two new kids and barely have the time for anything else. Faizon Love, recently divorced, is kidding himself by dating
Kali Hawk, who's pretty much just a kid. And Jon Favreau and Kristin Davis got married early when they faced
the prospect of their daughter and are now counting out the clock until she
splits off to college and they can split for good.
And so in the script (credited to Vaughn, Favreau and Dana Fox) we have a
pretty deft portrait of four different marriages: the new parents, the
can't-be-parents, the recent parents and the recently divorced. Bell and
Bateman, desperate to work things out, want to go to a tropical resort's couples
counseling event, said to work wonders, but can only afford it if they get the
group rate. Figuring they'll play while their friends work, the other three
couples sign up, but are informed by the island's couples guru Jean Reno and his majordomo Peter Serafinowicz (doing an early-Walken weirdness thing, and quite well) that, to get the
group rate, they all have to do the couples workshop.
And while the three supposedly-fine couples demur, they, it turns out, could
use a little fine-tuning. And this may be the best thing about "Couples
Retreat": It has comedy around the marriages (and relationships) but it never
treats the marriages and relationships as jokes. So while, yes, Reno explains
how his teachings are based on a mix of "yoga, tai chi and 'The Art of War,'" we
also get to see these characters as something close to real people in something
close to crisis. (Bateman and Bell are the clear acting winners in this regard,
delivering scenes of real affection and real sadness, with Vaughn and Akerman a
close second; Love and Hawk's problems get solved a bit too tidily, and Favreau
and Davis' a bit too broadly for any real acting to be required.)
But while the relationship material in "Couples Retreat" is handled with the
same hard-nosed, open-eyed honesty as "The Break-Up," a lot of the supposedly
funny bits in "Couples Retreat" aren't. A bit with a hard-bodied yoga instructor
with very little modesty and no sense of personal space (Carlos Ponce, in what
would have been a Hank Azaria role five or 10 years ago) isn't especially
amusing. Favreau's motor-mouthed horndog ways also have a limited shelf life.
And while having four couples in the mix means that "Couples Retreat" can
explore many different kinds of trouble, it also means that the laughs get a
little diluted by a slightly too-large scope and a slightly too-long running
time.
But there are laughs in "Couples Retreat," like Vaughn being confounded by
Akerman asking him to choose a finish for their kitchen cupboard handles, with
options of "nickel, brushed nickel, chrome, or brushed chrome." Or how Love,
told he has to do couples counseling, lapses into "Enter the Dragon" references: "And now we're on Han's
island." But the final-act conclusions come a bit too easily, and a bit too
swiftly, and the film has a completely mischosen final scene that, while it may
hearken back to an earlier joke, abandons the eight central characters and
leaves you feeling sour and unsatisfied, asking a rhetorical question of
everyone involved: "Really, this is the best final scene you could think of?
Really?"
"Couples Retreat" looks gorgeous, and has a bunch of fun people in it. But,
as Steven Soderbergh noted when making "Ocean's Eleven," if there were a correlation between how
much fun a movie is to make and how good it actually is, "Cannonball Run" would beat out "Citizen Kane" for the honor of greatest film ever. "Couples
Retreat" has a great cast, a gorgeous setting and a well-balanced tone about the
reality of relationships; it's when you watch the script unfold that you can see
where this "Retreat" could have used a better plan of attack.
Also:
Gallery: Unhappily Ever After
Critic in Paradise
James Rocchi's writings on film have appeared at Cinematical.com,
Netflix.com, SFGate.com and in Mother Jones magazine. He lives in Los Angeles,
where every ending is a twist ending. | |