City of Ember has almost anything one could want from a science fiction-based family adventure film: likeable characters, an imaginative setting, and a fast pace.Read Full Review »
70
Washington Post: Neely Tucker
It's not an entirely convincing trip, but it is the sort of satisfying movie you wished they would make more often.Read Full Review »
67
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Gregory Kirschling
The story, which follows two kids who try to save their burg from blackouts, isn't well-executed, losing itself to unclear mythology and sci-fi gibberish.Read Full Review »
63
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES: Roger Ebert
It's innocent and sometimes kind of charming. The sets are entertaining. There are parallels in appearance and theme to a low-rent "Dark City."Read Full Review »
63
Philadelphia Inquirer: Steven Rea
All the running, the hiding, the escaping (from giant moles, from giant Murray) are decidedly less exciting, and compelling, than City of Ember wants to be.Read Full Review »
63
USA Today: Claudia Puig
At its best when sticking to a classic sci-fi-fantasy format. But when it tries to be a generic thrill ride, it loses its originality and peculiar charm.Read Full Review »
63
Boston Globe: Ty Burr
City of Ember lacks the vision and scope of "WALL-E," but it's based on a pretty good kids' book and it makes a pretty good "Twilight Zone" episode, with hope dangling at the end rather than one of Rod Serling's cosmic black jokes.Read Full Review »
50
LOS ANGELES TIMES: Robert Abele
None of this means that the film is necessarily enjoyable to watch, however, which is often the problem when the rigors of inspired storytelling can't live up to an imaginatively designed filmic world.Read Full Review »
50
The New York Times: Stephen Holden
At only 95 minutes, the movie feels as though it had been shredded in the editing room. In Hollywood-speak, it has a weak second act.Read Full Review »
50
ROLLING STONE: Peter Travers
You long for things to go bump in the night, but the movie muffles every risk in a blanket of bland.Read Full Review »