Casino Royale

:

Critics' Reviews

Metascore
®
81
Universal Acclaim
out of 100
'Casino Royale' is Prime Bond
By John Hartl, Film critic, MSNBC

Batman and Superman have been reinvented for the 21st Century, so why not James Bond? Especially when you've signed Daniel Craig to play him.

This talented 38-year-old British actor, whose burning blue eyes have been highly visible in a variety of recent movies ("Munich," "Infamous"), brings a lean, serious, plausible quality to agent 007 that's quite welcome. After too many Bonds who seemed addicted to tossing off groaner one-liners and double entendres, in "Casino Royale," Craig makes 007 dangerous again.

Not to mention human. This Bond is capable of falling in love and getting hurt; he doesn't respond to torture with silence, nor does he react to poisoning as if he were invincible. On the other hand, he's muscular and flexible enough to convince us that he's capable of surviving a breathtaking series of fights and athletic stunts.

The stiletto dialogue is a big help. Especially enjoyable are Bond's prickly exchanges with M (Judi Dench), who lectures him about arrogance and suggests that he learn something about self-awareness. His exchanges with the villains are equally testy, while mostly lacking the campiness that afflicted even some of the earlier Sean Connery films.

Paul Haggis, the Oscar-winning screenwriter of "Crash" and "Million Dollar Baby," had a hand in the script, which kicks off with a mean and gritty black-and-white fight sequence that instantly announces that this Bond is different. Only after the sequence ends with 007 triumphant does color — blood red, of course — trickle down over the traditional Bond logo.

Martin Campbell, who was previously praised for resurrecting Bond in "GoldenEye" (1995), is the director, and once more he delivers a series of astonishingly well-staged action sequences. He also manages to squelch the boredom potential of a lengthy gambling sequence by deftly interrupting it a couple of times for dramatic effect.

Ian Fleming's first Bond book, "Casino Royale" was inititally dramatized for a one-hour 1954 television show starring Barry Nelson. It also served as the basis for a clumsy 1966 spoof starring David Niven as Bond and Woody Allen as his nephew, Jimmy Bond Jr.

This third version takes place in 2006, in an insecure world fatigued by terrorism and treachery. The situation makes M long for the good old days of the Cold War, even as she disses Bond for creating an international incident by attacking a prisoner at an embassy.

The buildup to that incident, which involves vertigo-inducing acrobatics on a construction site, comes early in the picture, and it's the kind of show-stopper that's difficult to top. Wisely, Campbell and his writers (including Bond veterans Neal Purvis and Robert Wade) don't really try.

They're more interested in developing a credible love story for Bond and his latest conquest (French actress Eva Green) that rivals the relationship between 007 and Diana Rigg in 1969's "On Her Majesty's Secret Service." The filmmakers take their time (this is the longest Bond movie to date), and Green may be no Rigg, but it's remarkable how well the match works.

More movies on MSNBC 

Batman and Superman have been reinvented for the 21st Century, so why not James Bond? Especially when you've signed Daniel Craig to play him.

This talented 38-year-old British actor, whose burning blue eyes have been highly visible in a variety of recent movies ("Munich," "Infamous"), brings a lean, serious, plausible quality to agent 007 that's quite welcome. After too many Bonds who seemed addicted to tossing off groaner one-liners and double entendres, in "Casino Royale," Craig makes 007 dangerous again.

Not to mention human. This Bond is capable of falling in love and getting hurt; he doesn't respond to torture with silence, nor does he react to poisoning as if he were invincible. On the other hand, he's muscular and flexible enough to convince us that he's capable of surviving a breathtaking series of fights and athletic stunts.

The stiletto dialogue is a big help. Especially enjoyable are Bond's prickly exchanges with M (Judi Dench), who lectures him about arrogance and suggests that he learn something about self-awareness. His exchanges with the villains are equally testy, while mostly lacking the campiness that afflicted even some of the earlier Sean Connery films.

Paul Haggis, the Oscar-winning screenwriter of "Crash" and "Million Dollar Baby," had a hand in the script, which kicks off with a mean and gritty black-and-white fight sequence that instantly announces that this Bond is different. Only after the sequence ends with 007 triumphant does color — blood red, of course — trickle down over the traditional Bond logo.

Martin Campbell, who was previously praised for resurrecting Bond in "GoldenEye" (1995), is the director, and once more he delivers a series of astonishingly well-staged action sequences. He also manages to squelch the boredom potential of a lengthy gambling sequence by deftly interrupting it a couple of times for dramatic effect.

Ian Fleming's first Bond book, "Casino Royale" was inititally dramatized for a one-hour 1954 television show starring Barry Nelson. It also served as the basis for a clumsy 1966 spoof starring David Niven as Bond and Woody Allen as his nephew, Jimmy Bond Jr.

This third version takes place in 2006, in an insecure world fatigued by terrorism and treachery. The situation makes M long for the good old days of the Cold War, even as she disses Bond for creating an international incident by attacking a prisoner at an embassy.

The buildup to that incident, which involves vertigo-inducing acrobatics on a construction site, comes early in the picture, and it's the kind of show-stopper that's difficult to top. Wisely, Campbell and his writers (including Bond veterans Neal Purvis and Robert Wade) don't really try.

They're more interested in developing a credible love story for Bond and his latest conquest (French actress Eva Green) that rivals the relationship between 007 and Diana Rigg in 1969's "On Her Majesty's Secret Service." The filmmakers take their time (this is the longest Bond movie to date), and Green may be no Rigg, but it's remarkable how well the match works.

More movies on MSNBC 

100
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Owen Gleiberman
Relaunches the series by doing something I wouldn't have thought possible: It turns Bond into a human being again -- a gruffly charming yet volatile chap who may be the swank king stud of the Western world, but who still has room for rage, fear, vulnerability, love.Read Full Review »
100
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES: Roger Ebert
This movie is NEW from the get-go. It could be your first Bond. In fact, it was the first Bond; it was Ian Fleming's first 007 novel, and he was still discovering who the character was.Read Full Review »
90
Village Voice: Robert Wilonsky
Craig, excellent in both art house endeavors (The Mother, Enduring Love) and blockbuster think pieces (Munich), has both a nasty streak and a soft side never before seen in the series; Fleming would recognize him as most like his literary creation: damaged goods in a tailored tux.Read Full Review »
90
Salon.com: Stephanie Zacharek
This is Bond as we've never seen him, more naked, alive and mysterious than ever.Read Full Review »
88
ROLLING STONE: Peter Travers
Craig gives us James Bond in the fascinating act of inventing himself. This you do not want to miss.Read Full Review »
88
ReelViews: James Berardinelli
This is no longer the James Bond we know from the '60s, '70s, '80s, and '90s. Welcome to the new world of MI6's most storied agent.Read Full Review »
80
Washington Post: Stephen Hunter
Turns out to be cracking good entertainment, as well as a fresh start for the perdurable 21-picture franchise.Read Full Review »
80
Slate: Dana Stevens
Martin Campbell (who also directed Pierce Brosnan's first outing as Bond in "Goldeneye"), has chosen to give us a Bond who's both metaphorically and literally stripped bare. Let me take this opportunity to thank him for both.Read Full Review »
80
The New York Times: Manohla Dargis
The latest James Bond vehicle -- call him Bond, Bond 6.0 -- finds the British spy leaner, meaner and a whole lot darker.Read Full Review »
75
USA Today: Claudia Puig
The film is about a half hour too long. The third act drags and an extended high-stakes poker game doesn't always keep our attention. But this is a superior Bond.Read Full Review »
See all Casino Royale reviews at metacritic.com »