The computer animation of the monsters here is a herky-jerky cartoon blur that is anything but scary.Read Full Review »
38
ReelViews: James Berardinelli
Delpy's injection of class into an otherwise classless production raises the specter of what this film could have been with a better script and a better cast surrounding her.Read Full Review »
30
The New York Times: Stephen Holden
A slapdash, poorly acted, paint-by-numbers teen horror comedy, the sequel is too frenetically edited to build any suspense, and its special effects are strictly bargain basement.Read Full Review »
25
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES: Roger Ebert
Any plot discipline (necessary so that we care about some characters and not the others) has been lost in an orgy of special effects and general mayhem.Read Full Review »
25
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Owen Gleiberman
The cruddy, shot-in-a-warehouse settings are especially depressing, since the computer-generated special effects seem to be taking place in another movie entirely (a far livelier one). [9 Jan 1998, p. 47]Read Full Review »
10
LOS ANGELES TIMES: Kevin Thomas
A painfully anemic variation on John Landis' 1981 winner, "An American Werewolf in London." While the original had both wit and poignancy--and an affectionate and knowing tip-of-the-hat to werewolf movies past--this slapdash, silly new edition is so cut-rate it has Luxembourg and Amsterdam standing in for the City of Light.Read Full Review »
0
Washington Post: Stephen Hunter
It's all too silly to bother. Without style and attitude, nothing gets old faster than horror.Read Full Review »
Hotmail
