300

:

Critics' Reviews

Metascore
®
51
Mixed or Average Reviews
out of 100
'300' Is Something to See
By John Hartl, Film critic, MSNBC

When Rudolph Maté's epic about the Battle of Thermopylae, "The 300 Spartans," was released in 1962, it arrived at the tail end of Hollywood's longest sword-and-sandals cycle. Critics and audiences promptly ignored it.

Zack Snyder's opulent eye-candy remake, "300," on the other hand, is one of 2007's most anticipated movies. Already it's generating buzz about how much of Snyder's portrayal of the 480 B.C. conflict has contemporary relevance.

Is the Greek hero, King Leonidas of Sparta, intended to carry echoes of President Bush, or does that distinction belong to his enemy, the Persian emperor Xerxes? Could it be that the Greeks, who pride themselves on their fighting skills and their knowledge of their terrain, correspond to Afghanistan's fighters? Do the Persians suggest an invading force lost in a quagmire partly of their own making?

With the actors spouting lines like "Freedom isn't free at all" and "Never retreat, never surrender," it's tempting to pursue 21st-century parallels but, in the end, they don't take you very far. The more the characters sound like modern warriors, the less their particular situation seems to apply.

"300" is based on Frank Miller and Lynn Varley's 1998 graphic novel, and Snyder claims that his personal political position is irrelevant. He has a point: The movie is less about wartime politics than it is about the kind of computer-enhanced imagery that distinguished the 2005 movie of Miller's "Sin City."

It's a battlefield epic re-imagined in film-noir terms. Dominated by haunted landscapes, slow-motion scenes of slaughter and decapitation and hallucinatory closeups of actors who don't always register as characters, it quickly establishes a barbarous world with no rules. Implicit is a frankly skeptical response to the very idea of civilization.

The opening sequence, in which a Spartan child is brutally raised to become part of a "warrior society," sets the tone immediately. Might makes right in this world, even when 300 Spartans are outnumbered by a massive Persian army that means to enslave them. It's the quality of Sparta's soldiers that is supposed to make the difference in a showdown with the enemy.

In the ancient-world blockbusters of the 1950s and'60s, a British accent usually indicated a Nazi-like villain, while Americans tended to play the oppressed heroes. Britain's David Farrar played Xerxes in "The 300 Spartans," while the incorrigibly American Richard Egan was Leonidas.

Snyder's remake mixes things up, with the Scottish-born Gerard Butler giving a star-making performance as Leonidas, and the exotic Brazilian actor, Rodrigo Santoro, seductively playing Xerxes. The British Lena Headey makes the most of her few scenes as Leonidas' wife, who bravely faces harrassment by her husband's nastiest rival.

Snyder made his directing debut with the scary, funny 2004 remake of "Dawn of the Dead," and he once more transforms familiar material and makes it his own. It isn't easy to warm to the characters, who are invariably extreme, but the film is carried by its startling imagery and by Butler's passionate authority.

More movies on MSNBC 

When Rudolph Maté's epic about the Battle of Thermopylae, "The 300 Spartans," was released in 1962, it arrived at the tail end of Hollywood's longest sword-and-sandals cycle. Critics and audiences promptly ignored it.

Zack Snyder's opulent eye-candy remake, "300," on the other hand, is one of 2007's most anticipated movies. Already it's generating buzz about how much of Snyder's portrayal of the 480 B.C. conflict has contemporary relevance.

Is the Greek hero, King Leonidas of Sparta, intended to carry echoes of President Bush, or does that distinction belong to his enemy, the Persian emperor Xerxes? Could it be that the Greeks, who pride themselves on their fighting skills and their knowledge of their terrain, correspond to Afghanistan's fighters? Do the Persians suggest an invading force lost in a quagmire partly of their own making?

With the actors spouting lines like "Freedom isn't free at all" and "Never retreat, never surrender," it's tempting to pursue 21st-century parallels but, in the end, they don't take you very far. The more the characters sound like modern warriors, the less their particular situation seems to apply.

"300" is based on Frank Miller and Lynn Varley's 1998 graphic novel, and Snyder claims that his personal political position is irrelevant. He has a point: The movie is less about wartime politics than it is about the kind of computer-enhanced imagery that distinguished the 2005 movie of Miller's "Sin City."

It's a battlefield epic re-imagined in film-noir terms. Dominated by haunted landscapes, slow-motion scenes of slaughter and decapitation and hallucinatory closeups of actors who don't always register as characters, it quickly establishes a barbarous world with no rules. Implicit is a frankly skeptical response to the very idea of civilization.

The opening sequence, in which a Spartan child is brutally raised to become part of a "warrior society," sets the tone immediately. Might makes right in this world, even when 300 Spartans are outnumbered by a massive Persian army that means to enslave them. It's the quality of Sparta's soldiers that is supposed to make the difference in a showdown with the enemy.

In the ancient-world blockbusters of the 1950s and'60s, a British accent usually indicated a Nazi-like villain, while Americans tended to play the oppressed heroes. Britain's David Farrar played Xerxes in "The 300 Spartans," while the incorrigibly American Richard Egan was Leonidas.

Snyder's remake mixes things up, with the Scottish-born Gerard Butler giving a star-making performance as Leonidas, and the exotic Brazilian actor, Rodrigo Santoro, seductively playing Xerxes. The British Lena Headey makes the most of her few scenes as Leonidas' wife, who bravely faces harrassment by her husband's nastiest rival.

Snyder made his directing debut with the scary, funny 2004 remake of "Dawn of the Dead," and he once more transforms familiar material and makes it his own. It isn't easy to warm to the characters, who are invariably extreme, but the film is carried by its startling imagery and by Butler's passionate authority.

More movies on MSNBC 

75
ReelViews: James Berardinelli
300 may not offer masterful storytelling in a conventional sense, but it's hard to beat as a spectacle and that makes it worthwhile viewing for all but the most squeamish of potential audience members.Read Full Review »
75
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Lisa Schwarzbaum
Look, but don't be touched: There is much to see but little to remember in this telling of a battle we are meant never to forget.Read Full Review »
75
ROLLING STONE: Peter Travers
300 is a movie blood-drunk on its own artful excess. Guys of all ages and sexes won't be able to resist it.Read Full Review »
63
USA Today: Claudia Puig
The action epic 300 is so overblown, overheated and over the top that on some level, it's fun to get caught up in the operatic dizziness of it.Read Full Review »
50
Philadelphia Inquirer: Steven Rea
300 is "Gladiator" for the gamer set.Read Full Review »
50
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES: Roger Ebert
My deepest objection to the movie is that it is so blood-soaked. When dialogue arrives to interrupt the carnage, it's like the seventh-inning stretch.Read Full Review »
50
LOS ANGELES TIMES: Kenneth Turan
300 is something to see, but unless you love violence as much as a Spartan, Quentin Tarantino or a video-game-playing teenage boy, you will not be endlessly fascinated.Read Full Review »
50
Boston Globe: Wesley Morris
There's a stale, synthetic airlessness about the movie. Imagine a large cast trapped in a series of spectacular screensavers. It could be ancient Greece. It could be somebody's hard drive.Read Full Review »
40
Slate: Dana Stevens
300 will be talked about as a technical achievement, the next blip on the increasingly blurry line between movies and video games.Read Full Review »
40
Salon.com: Stephanie Zacharek
The bigger question to ask about 300 is why, for a supposedly rousing tale of heroism, it's so curiously unaffecting.Read Full Review »
See all 300 reviews at metacritic.com »